Our daughter Emily is living with us this summer, before she begins graduate school in September. Gary, Emily and I have had many conversations the past few weeks about diversity, inclusiveness and tolerance. Gary and I are involved in diversity initiatives at our workplaces, and notwithstanding Chick-Fil-A, there is a lot of talk about same-sex marriage in Minnesota these days. On the November ballot, Minnesotans will vote on a state constitutional amendment to ban marriage for same-sex couples. Passage of this amendment would benefit no family, create no job, defend no institution, nor welcome any person to Minnesota. But it would hurt, disadvantage, and stigmatize tens of thousands of Minnesotans - loving, committed same-sex couples - and their families. Gary and I are opposed to this amendment and we have a sign and a rainbow flag in our yard indicating our opposition. We are firmly committed to diversity and inclusiveness. We are hopeful that the sign and flag will stir conversation among our neighbors, like it has around our dinner table.
I was admittedly disappointed that my Facebook post about our yard sign generated only 5 "likes" and no comments, yet Facebook and Twitter are blowing up over Chick-Fil-A. I came home from work yesterday, and Emily presented me with the article below. We always tease her that she's like a Snapple cap -- full of facts and information - so I wasn't really surprised that she took it upon herself to do some research about homosexuality and the Bible. Obviously she's ready to get back to school!
Just sayin'.
Laurie
Homosexuality
and the Bible
By Emily Heiser
Unless you’ve been living under a rock for the last several
weeks, chances are you’ve heard about the CEO of Chick-fil-A, Dan Cathy,
declaring in an interview that he has made significant donations to traditional
pro-marriage organizations. In the
wake of yesterday’s “Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day,” I decided to do some
research on what the Bible says about homosexuality. Like many, I have strong opinions on same-sex relationships
and gay marriage. But, as one of my Loyola University philosophy professors once
said, “Opinions are merely assertions one makes. They hold no weight unless supported
by scholarly evidence.” So, I went
to work researching homosexuality and the Bible.
The Bible as we know it today has gone through hundreds of
changes since its original manuscript (The Torah or Old Testament) was written,
which scholars estimate was around 450 B.C. The Bible’s original manuscripts were written in ancient
Greek, Hebrew, and Aramaic. The
gospels of the New Testament were all written between 60-95 C.E. It is generally accepted that Jesus died
around 30 C.E., meaning that the very first manuscript of the New Testament,
the Gospel of Matthew, was written nearly 30 years after the death of
Christ.
The word homosexual and the concept of homosexuality is a
product of the modern-era, emerging in the 19th century when the study of human
sexuality as a science began. There is no word or term for homosexual or
homosexuality in ancient Greek, Hebrew, or Aramaic, the languages of the
Bible’s original manuscripts. Perhaps the most cited biblical verse in
regards to the denunciation of homosexuality is Leviticus 18:22: “Do not lie with a man as one lies with
a woman; that is detestable.” A
word for word translation analysis of this passage by an Old Testament scholar
at the University of Amsterdam showed that this passage does not prohibit all
same-sex behavior. Rather, it was
meant to control where male-male intercourse was allowed. It could not be performed in a woman’s
bed, because that location was sacred. Sexual activity between heterosexual couples would also be
ritually unclean if performed in a woman’s bed. Literally translated, this Leviticus passage would have read
something like “Two men must not
engage in sexual activity on a woman’s bed; it is ritually unclean.” There were other rituals that were
also consider unclean, such as getting too close to a dead body, eating shellfish, or
combining meat and dairy. None of
these were considered sinful or condemned, however. There are some Bible
verses correctly translated from Hebrew that do condemn same-sex sexual
behavior; however, it is behavior within
contexts related to violence, idolatry, promiscuity, and exploitation that
is condemned, not the same-sex sexual
relationship. The same condemnation
is given to opposite sex sexual behavior that is violent, idolatrous, promiscuous
or exploitative.
Dan Cathy stated, “We’re inviting God’s judgment on our
nation when we shake our fist at Him and say we know better than you as to what
constitutes a marriage.” How we consider and define marriage in the 21st
century is nowhere close to how marriage was defined, or practiced 2000 years
ago. In biblical times, if a
woman was raped, she became married to her rapist. If a woman was sold, she became married to her buyer. If a slave’s master gave a female slave
to a male slave for procreation, the enslaved “couple” were considered
married. A couple who lived
together was also considered married. Polygamy was widely practiced and accepted. In some cases, a man
of wealth and means was allowed up to 18 wives. Not so “traditional,” huh?
In my research I found no scholarly evidence denouncing consensual,
loving homosexual relationships in the Bible. In fact, there may be as many as three references in the
Bible to committed homosexual relationships. The story of Ruth and Naomi is one such relationship. Ruth 1:14, referring to the
relationship between Ruth and Naomi, reads, “Ruth clave onto her.” The Hebrew word “clave” is identical to
the word used in the description of a heterosexual marriage in Genesis 2:24:
“Therefore shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall cleave unto his
wife and they shall be one flesh.”
The most famous reference in the Bible of homosexual love is
the relationship between David and Jonathan. Yes, King David of Israel, from whom Jesus is believed to be
a direct descendent. I’ll wait
while you pick your jaw up off the floor….ok, ready? The bond between David and
Jonathan is documented in the book of Samuel. 1 Samuel 18:1 reads, “The soul of Jonathan was knit with the
soul of David, and Jonathan loved him as his own soul. From that day, Saul [Jonathan’s father]
kept David with him and did not let him return to his father’s house.” This verse makes reference Genesis
2:24, in that David did not return to his parent’s home. Further, a physical relation between
David and Jonathan is apparent 1 Samuel 20:41, “David got up from the south
side of the stone and bowed down before Jonathan…then they kissed each other
and wept together, but David cried the most.” In 2 Samuel, during their last moments together David tells
Jonathan, “I grieve for you; you were very dear to me. Your love for me was wonderful, more
wonderful than that of a woman.” In
ancient Israel men and women were not allowed to be seen in public together,
nor were they allowed platonic relationships. It would not make sense in this verse to compare platonic
love for a man with sexual love for a woman. Therefore, in its original form,
David is referring to his sexual love for Jonathan.
What is happening today is not about chicken. The real issue is that we have lost
sight of what is important: love. “A new commandment I give unto you, that ye
love one another as I have loved you. By this shall all men know that ye are my
disciples if ye have love one to another.” John 13:34-35. In my heart of hearts and as an
advocate for equality, I believe that the Jesus I love and desire to emulate
would never turn his back on any person for any reason. Jesus made a habit of being in the
company of social pariahs; he himself was considered one by many.
My limited research and this short blog article are not
meant to be the final word on the subject of the bible and same-sex
relationships. Rather, I wanted to
point out that the bible is full of ambiguities, and in truth, unless one knows
ancient Greek, Hebrew, or Aramaic it is impossible to accurately translate the original
manuscripts of the bible.
No comments:
Post a Comment